You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #90: Precisely my point. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #76
90. Precisely my point.
Bush's plan (which is silently supported by many Democrats in Congress including, I suspect, Hillary) is to have a permanent strike force in the Middle East. I suspect the idea is to establish the American presence in a permanent way so that we are a given in the life of the Middle East the way we are in Europe where we have what have become permanent military outposts in Germany and membership.

Our presence in Western Europe is not perceived by the people who live there as being hostile at this point. We went into Europe as allies of European countries and with many, many friends in countries in which the then governments (during WWII) were puppets of the NAZIs. We shared a common cultural history with Europe. In contrast, we went into Iraq as invaders and we do not share a common cultural heritage. There is no evidence that the populations of the countries neighboring Iraq view us as friends. They don't really want us there at all.

Bush is just sending our soldiers in to act as targets. That is the reality of his "fight them over there so they won't come here" argument.


Bush's plan is for perpetual war. He is not building a bridge to peace. He is not creating relationships of mutual trust with the people in the Middle East. He is not leading the way toward cultural and religious tolerance. This perpetual war will fail as has every other Bush plan or effort.

We have to leave Iraq and draw all out troops out. If we can't keep our embassy safe, we will just have to conduct diplomatic relations with future Iraqi governments from Jordan or Kuwait or some other country in the region. We have inflicted terrible suffering on the Iraqi people. We have a moral obligation to get out and let some other institution like the United Nations Peacekeepers or an alliance of neighboring countries move in and establish the peace. We do not have the resources to fight in Iran, Iraq and who knows what country next.

Do you realize what would happen to oil supplies (and prices) if we invade Iran? Our economy would collapse. People in urban areas could starve. It is unthinkable. We cannot risk war with Iran. They tried to cross the border into Iraq way back in the '80s when they fought with Hussein. If the Iranians now tried to go in waves into Iraq to fight our meager forces in Iraq, their armies would be welcomed by the Iraqi Shiites, and I fear what the result would be for our armies. Iran is a very large country with a large population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC