Reply #55: Some Things Need Not Be Proven As Absurd And Ignorant, As They Show That All On Their Own.

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

But if you require reasoning as to what makes the OP so monumentally blind and narrow in logic, I'll give you a short and sweet logical conclusion ok?

The OP states:

"If one is against impeaching bush administration officials, then one is against the precepts of impeachment that the founders intended."

Now I believe that to be absurd and illogical on its face. But if you require a reason why, it's fairly easy. If the writers of the constitution intended impeachment to be used in such black and white narrow minded terms without things like discretion and alternative strategies being factors, then they would've made impeachment MANDATORY under such circumstances.

Hey, guess what pal; they didn't.

End of argument. I win. :hi: