You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: Thanks, Paul. I will look over your numbers. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
phildo Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thanks, Paul. I will look over your numbers.
The 30% was from numbers I ran with a couple of RE (renewable energy) groups two years ago when I wandered into the RE field from the electrical side (I R an EE).

I do see a couple differences on the modeling assumptions -- we were looking at US v. US (US max production v. US consumption) and also see that you are using the (older) assumptions that Ethanol production methods must be based on traditional (very energy intensive) methods.

My interest into it all was as an application of the large amounts of waste heat the solar electric (boiler not PV) designs I am working on. Turns out the output waste temperatures are optimal for Ethanol production -- about 200 to 190 F. Is useful for both distilling and cooking.

One last difference I see off-hand is the assumption that Ethanol engines produce less energy than gasoline -- that is true for conventional gasoline engines, which are relatively low compression. Engines that are optimized for Ethanol (much higher compression) get comparable outputs.

It also does not consider algae produced ethanol, but as that is still experimental as an industrial CO2 scrubbing method, I do not tend to include it yet, either.

But in all that, please understand I am in no way advocating any attempt near that 15 or even 30% replacement. It is just a way of declaring an upper bound and awareness that even the upper limits of production is WAY below consumption.

My present future fantasy would be a near total electric conversion of ground transportation. How an EE would see the world, huh? :) Trains, trucks, autos -- all pulling their power source from a grid based system -- but that is a whole other topic -- with a whole lot more other numbers. :)

In some post-petroleum future and barring some radical technology breakthrough, the only applications I have seen that liquid biofuels are optimal for are:

Aircraft (depending on overall demand)
Emergency vehicles,
Extreme offroad and some military vehicles, and
Backup and emergency electrical generation.

With biofuels of:

Ethanol, Bio-diesel, and Butanol (a 4 carbon alcohol that behave much like gasoline)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC