You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: You certainly are hung up [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. You certainly are hung up
on the fact that another country just might have different laws.

I have not disputed that. Quite the opposite actually. I detailed the difficulties of an acquaintance, a French citizen, who was unable to have a church wedding ceremony in Paris because of a technicality regarding the manner in which the French statutes are interpreted and applied. Technically he complied with all the requirements of the French statutes. It was the application of those statutes that was the problem. That is a problem one would not necessarily anticipate based on a reading of a statute. It is a matter that can be either interpretative or procedural or some combination of the two.

I have pointed out that sometimes there are problems discovering and understanding the technicalities of foreign legal requirements. Attorneys generally contract foreign counsel to advise them regarding foreign law. I have pointed out that folks often lose their objectivity when it comes to their own matters. You condemn TB Guy for being less than perfect in his own affairs and yet you find legal conclusions based on a Google search and a phone call acceptable.

You refuse to recognize the existence of interpretative and procedural issues and challenges regarding foreign laws. That refusal is tantamount to suggesting that the color blue is universally agreed to have a single recognized tint, tone and shade. Meanwhile, some folks understand blue to mean something closer to navy while others understand it to refer to the color of a clear afternoon sky. Procedurally, tint, tones and shades of blue are derived and mixed differently depending on whether an artist is using additive or subtractive color theory. Not everyone agrees that the primary colors are red, yellow and blue. In the absence of an interpretative context, “blue” is pretty much meaningless. Same is true of words in statutes.

Remind me again that other countries have their own legal requirements that I can easily identify via Google search and confirm through a phone call to the local embassy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC