If he were the leader he says he is, why did 133 house repubs vote it down? Am I missing something? 133 repubs voted nay, and then the repubs turn around and blame the dems for it's failure? I don't understand the logic.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(486 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
