You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #11: Summarizing Ed Schultz's argument (as I understand it)
[View All]
jerseyjack
(369 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-20-11 05:17 AM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Summarizing Ed Schultz's argument (as I understand it) |
|
The Attorney General told the president it was legal. Therefore, it was o.k. Does everyone support Bush on torture because John Yoo told him it was o.k.?
Schultz's second argument: Michael Moore should just shut up. That's the approach you take when you can't defend your argument.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread