You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #99: I agree. But it's already mandated by the CDC. There is an opt-out clause, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #96
99. I agree. But it's already mandated by the CDC. There is an opt-out clause,
however. Increased testing may not occur. It may not happen - and health care providers will be deprived of both state and federal funds - because health care providers simply do not have the money to do it. The other very serious problem is that there is no guarantee that those who test positive will not be fired from their jobs, denied insurance coverage or life insurance, and stigmatized in hurtful, sometimes violent ways.

Although covered by the ADA, religious institutions can readily ignore those laws based on their core beliefs, and the US military and other federal agencies - including blood banks - have the right to deny to accept a blood donation from anyone who has EVER had sex with someone of the same sex. Religious zealots and fundamentalists have inserted themselves into the arena of science and medicine to the point where the rule of law and ethics have been replaced by theology. The effect is that people with treatable diseases will cower in fear and end up seeking care only when they are very sick.

Everything about this drives me nuts! I still encourage everyone to be tested regularly for STDS and HIV, but not without a discussion of its' implications with an independent community based organization that knows what they are talking about.

Always good to hear your comments Bluebear. Let's keep this thread going indefinitely! I'm also learning as we discuss. For example, for all the men who sex with men who I have treated, not one has ever mentioned that using a condom as "sexualizing the act". I hope that means when they have sex that they consider consistent with their self-defined sexual orientation that they use condoms then! Thanks to JackBeck for that piece of info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC