You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: I would agree. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. I would agree.
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 09:26 PM by kgfnally
There WILL NOT be a more deserving appointee of a filibuster- UNLESS Bush gets to nominate a THIRD SCOTUS Justice.

That MAY be what they think they're waiting for. Janice was bad, Sam is worse... third time is the charm.

MAYBE.

(DEMS: In poker, or Magic, or whatever card game you name, the final is the worst. AN UNUSED GOOD CARD IS AS BAD AS A BAD CARD.The Pubs are treating this like a football game- in consistency with their membership- and WE HAVE TO THINK LIKE THAT to stop them.)

So, given that.... what's the next play?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC