You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #194: If you say so, however [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #143
194. If you say so, however
Edited on Mon Oct-30-06 09:24 AM by Jose Diablo
As you said, "Mathematics is not based on faith", what do you call this very basic, almost childish statement in math; the shortest distance between 2 points is a straight line and there can be only one straight line if not a statement of faith. Go ahead, try to prove it using a system of logic.

Now if you cannot prove the above listed statement using logic, then every statement after the basic unproven statement and depending on this statement in it's "proof" must also be based on faith (believing something without being seen, or proved).

To be sure, it seems true in all cases, but if you look deeper, you will see it's not as Reimann showed with his curved space geometry. In this example, he used the statement between 2 lines there are an infinite number of straight and parallel lines. Look at the surface of a globe with the longitudenal lines overlaying the parallel lines between the poles of the globe.

So in all systems of belief, we as humans make basic presumptions about the underlaying reality of the system we are working with. In the above examples, the presumptions are space is a flat plane or space is a positively curved surface.

In the end, we are all in the back of the cave, looking at the shadows and reflections of the greater reality outside the mouth of the cave.

For anyone to state they have the truth, here it is, is not understanding the basic limitations we as humans have in our ability to really know truth.

Repeatability or predictability have nothing to do with a set of "connected" mathematical logical statements. But like I said, although we cannot "prove" logically many things, the scientific method is still way better than any other system of belief we poor superstitious humans have been able to devise.

You are seeking an absolute truth in something, and there is a "truth", but none of us can prove it. Living is an act of faith, everything gets down at it's most basic level to believing in something unprovable or unseen, although many will claim to possess the "truth" none can prove it.

It's the nature of the reality we find ourselves in. It's better if we could all just go about our own business, allowing each other their own form of blindness, without the judgements on others being blind and ignorant because they do not "see" as we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC