You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: Yes, it would be "that hard" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Yes, it would be "that hard"
There are millions of people who just tune out and don't listen but do vote. One third of America thinks Saddam attacked us on 9/11. If after all this time and all the news and all the saturation of information that screams "SADDAM HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11" they haven't been convinced, then how the hell do you expect to be able to convince them that you are right and the Repubs are wrong about a legal term phrased in Latin that is generally only understood by lawyers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC