You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #46: No ID: I suspect some people find it hard to believe. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Ratty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
46. No ID: I suspect some people find it hard to believe.
About a month ago I finally got an official state photo ID. I don't own a car and haven't driven in decades so keeping a current drivers license simply was not a priority for me. I'm a citizen, was born and raised here. I'm not poor. I have a college education. I *used* to have a drivers license when I drove as a teenager, and it was good for years and years after it expired as an official ID (turns out people accepted it as valid ID, even at airports). But as it became more and more outdated and its physical condition deteriorated I found myself in more situations in which it was NOT accepted as ID (e.g., trying to buy now-controlled antihistamines at the drug store).

So I lived without any kind of official state identification for over a decade. I'm not defending myself, not trying to explain *why* I never bothered to get it. I simply didn't. I have a birth certificate, I have a social security card. There is plenty of proof that I am a US citizen. But a photo ID I simply never bothered to get. I have recently found out that there are a LOT of other citizens just like me who, for whatever reason, have never bothered to keep a current photo ID. Do you know that you *must* now provide your fingerprint to get a license or state photo ID? It was a surprise to me because you didn't used to have to. And now it's all computerized and put into a huge database. It scares me.

So I'm just saying, in case you're wondering what kind of legal citizen doesn't have a photo ID or thinking that anyone who doesn't is a criminal or has something to hide or is trying to pass themselves off as a citizen when in fact they aren't--well, I'm just saying that's not true. I'm saying it's not even true most of the time or even a large part of the time. Not having a photo ID, believe it or not, is not uncommon for legal adult citizens. I'm just saying ...

I know it's unconstitutional to require a national identity card, but I wonder about the constitutionality of requiring a STATE identity card?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC