I am saying that Fitz told Luskin to say that Rove was off the hook so that everyone would think so. That way the WH doesn't know he was indicted and is now working against the WH. Fitz did that as a direct result of the TO report. He had to silence the report to keep his investigation going. Fitz would not be disbarred. Which is a really short way of saying it. Look at my other posts in this thread.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
