Reply #81: I am pointing out your distorted either/or argument

[lala_rawraw]

So what if he has a checkered past, who are you to judge him? What have you done that was oooooo so important that you have the right to sit in judgment of someone working their ass off to get info to you? Wait, how did RS get into this? Oh, wait, you are one of the gang-a-thin folks who needs a reason to attack the alternative press. RS asks you nothing. You don't like RS, don't read it. You know real journalism? God, how sick is this, a five year old attacking a journalist doing his best because she can type like a monkey. Pathetic. Stop attacking our, that is the left's, journalists who are the only real journalists we have. If you want to be a journalist, go be one. Who the hell are you to attack Jason over and over and then when I come to his defense you smear an entire publication that I happen to write for? Pathetic and cheap and really undeserving of anything, including truth. Really, yes, you are that pathetic that you are actually sitting in judgment over a person you do not know, know nothing about, and judge on hearsay and gossip and then you claim some sort of ethics in all of this? Wow, you must really be very important and very honorable. What do you do dear that puts you out into the world like this where you are under attack from all sides, what? Do tell us what right you have to attack someone because they have a "checkered past"? Pathetic and CU is waiting for your return. I am done tolerating vitriols against journalists from half wits who have no clue what people have to go through to get a story out. You don't like his work, don't read him. You don't like my work, don't read me. What is this obsession with bringing people down, dragging them through the mud, and spreading bullshit about them as though you are in high school. Sick, pathetic, cheap and you call yourself a liberal? I don't think so.