You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #46: Huh?
[View All]
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-30-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
|
What in the heck are you talking about? Your argument was rooted in the point that the example of Iceland was specious because of the difference in scale. You are the one who mentioned 300k v. 300M.
To suggest that the example is invalid, or the solution impractical because it wouldn't be easy to scale it up a thousandfold, is apropos of nothing. It does not have to scale up a thousandfold to be a practical solution.
Now, you're conveniently changing the framing. All i commented upon was the fact that the "scaleability" is not an argument against geothermal energy.
The Professor
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread