You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #91: Well, too bad for those who don't see that it's a solution.
[View All]
Gormy Cuss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-22-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
| 91. Well, too bad for those who don't see that it's a solution. |
|
If all the state does for anyone is a civil union, I'm fine with that. I don't like the idea of creating a second category for gays that could be construed as inferior. Marriage can be the word for the folks who think of it as a religious ceremony and they can duke it out with their own denominations whether that includes gays. For the state, it shouldn't be an issue. Any two adults ought to be able to join legally with the same set of rights and responsibilities.
Not that I have an opinion on this.
:silly:
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread