Reply #128: IA, if she honestly thought it was the law when she did the

[treestar]

Bush v. Gore decision, she had to go with it. We can disagree but the court is supposed to be following the law, not politics. That would be why she might oppose unconstitutional parts of the Patriot Act, even though Bush signed them, for instance.

It is a nation under the rule of law and sad so many people don't even get that. They talk as if the court is just another legislature (when they go on about how it is "unelected" one realizes that's how they look at it).