Reply #353: Excuse me? You seem to be neglecting the central FACT that

[file83]

Kerry conceeded the election immediately. Once the election was conceeded immediately - all efforts afterwards of "investigateing" the election were futile. It doesn't matter how much "hot air" Kerry spouted about how he was "looking into" the election fraud allegations after conceeding - like I've said before - I look at a mans ACTIONS. Politicians talk a lot if you haven't noticed. And Kerry's ACTION of conceeding speaks louder than any words or futile research being conducted AFTER THE FACT.

Furthermore, if you think that Kerry ran a good campaign, then you have a loser attitude. His campaign failed. That is FACT. It failed. So your opinion that Kerry ran a "good campaign" is the real "misperception of what occured".

But then again, it just comes back to how you define "Good".

You define "Good" as Kerry's 2004 campaign. Yet it failed.
You define "Good" as Kerry in 2008. Yet it will....?

Based on your "definition" of "Good", you seem to prove my point: Kerry in 2008 is a "Bad" idea.