Reply #107: You seem pretty intensely devoted

[symbolman]

to proving absolutely no wrong doing on the part of Raw Story for someone that appeared to say that they were taking NO SIDES in this.

I agree with the COMPLAINT of the OP about RS's TACTICS, that they are not to be trusted - but like I said, IF, and I have not looked at this volumious thead, but think someone posted that there was an actual THREAT TO SUE Raw STory (IS THAT TRUE?) then I would have to agree that Raw STory was threatened.

IF SO WHY did they take it down, and then put it back up again? WHY did they claim there was to be 26 INDICTMENTS by Fitzgerald, and the NEVER MENTION THAT AGAIN?

All related Stephanie..

I love your Precursor remark, "BECAUSE THE COMPLAINT IN THE OP IS RIDICULOUS." Stated as FACT. Sandwiched between a Knee Jerk and an Agreement that I (as a "traitor" to the progressives) somehow "agree" with some Right Winger AGAINST Raw STory..

Your line of questioning is hilarious really.

You stated that you don't understand what *I* am talking about before?

Well, you're not making a whole lot of sense right now..

"MR Symbolman, is it TRUE that you are STILL Beating Your WIFE?"


Old Trick.. you must be a paralegal.. not quite a lawyer..