You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Been looking in to this [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Been looking in to this
How come there is no newspaper articles regarding this court ruling?
How come this case hasn't received an review? If it did, why not NYS court of appeals?
This case is from 1997. It is now 2006. Since I don't have the court calender...why is this not settled?

Rachel Bevilacqua received court orders from this judge. Are these orders posted online anywhere?

My guess (I am interested in this situation. I want more info.) is that this lady put on an awful "performance" in front of the family court judge. My guess is that there were all sorts of conditions that she needed to meet to ensure that her child would be safe and successful while in her custody. My guess is that instead of doing what she needed to regain custody of her child, she played "performance artist". I want to know what happened.

I would like to know the following:

Did Rachel Bevilacqua have full time employment?
Did Rachel Bevilacqua have permanent housing?
Did Rachel Bevilacqua have a recognized substance abuse issue?
Did Rachel Bevilacqua's child successfully attend an education program?
Why were the pictures in question allowed in court (did hubby or DSS offer them as evidence?)?
Did Rachel Bevilacqua comply with her family court orders.
There should have been a family court review of this ruling 6 months after the ruling. Did this happen?



I've looked on line and I cannot find a link to a newspaper regarding this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC