Reply #46: I'm not inclined to think that too large a turnout in some Cuyahoga County

[Time for change]

precincts is a problem, but I could be wrong.

The highest turnouts are not too far out of line. We only have two precincts with over 80% (82% and 87%).

But on the other hand, the four top turnout precincts are all Bush precincts, and furthermore, regression analysis shows that Bush voting for the county in general is strongly correlated with "increased turnout" (r squared = 0.21 p<.001).

I don't know what that means. I think that if we look at those precincts and the pre-tabulator vote actually is LESS than the post-tabulator vote, that would be VERY suspicious -- close to conclusive proof of fraud IMO, assuming that the rest of our analysis was consistent with that.