You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: Here's another reason RW crazies might want to throw Sanford off a balcony [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Here's another reason RW crazies might want to throw Sanford off a balcony
Edited on Thu Dec-28-06 07:08 AM by leveymg
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2004/March/24/local/stories/02local.htm
March 24, 2004


Aptos lawyer takes part in high court pledge case
By CATHY REDFERN
Sentinel STAFF WRITER

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Aptos attorney Paul S. Sanford will be in the hallowed halls of the U.S. Supreme Court today as he helps an Elk Grove man argue to the country’s highest justices why the words "under God" should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance.Michael Newdow, father of a 9-year-old fourth-grader, sued the Elk Grove school district near Sacramento over the use of the words he claims violate the separation of church and state. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco agreed the phrase did not belong in a government-sanctioned pledge.

SNIP

Sanford also filed an amicus brief in support of Newdow’s case for American Atheists Inc. More than 40 briefs have been filed. "He’s somewhat of a lone crusader," Sanford said. "He doesn’t have a staff. I’m really impressed with his guts." Newdow, an atheist, doesn’t want his daughter exposed to the phrase "under God" when reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in school. The former emergency room physician who earned a law degree in 2002 will give a 30- minute argument in front of the justices today. After the arguments, Sanford and Newdow will meet reporters on the steps of the court.

Sanford was raised Catholic in Boston. He earned a master’s degree in political science at Boston College before working as a political consultant for several years. In 1996, he earned his law degree from Monterey College of Law, focusing on Constitutional Law. He also taught constitutional law at Monterey College of Law and Cal State University Monterey Bay. Sanford practices mostly criminal defense, he said, and is drawn to cases of people whose civil liberties have been compromised. "My religious feelings are not particularly relevant," he said. "I’m not an atheist, but I am very sympathetic to their plight. They are profoundly discriminated against in our culture and it’s a great honor to have the opportunity to represent a group that is routinely demeaned and belittled.

"Cases in which people’s rights are threatened by the government are almost always unpopular — atheists, the homeless, people charged with crimes. It’s their rights that need protection."

SNIP

Contact Cathy Redfern at [email protected].

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC