Reply #167: Yes it is

[johnnie]

My OP was pointing out that the do-gooders are now starting to come through your front door and this thread was almost automatically turned into a second-hand smoke issue. My main point is that one small segment of the proposal and people didn't get it.

I wasn't diverting attention, I was pointing out something that is just as harmful but overlooked by the pro-life anti-smoke crowd. People have been directed to only think of the smoke issue while scores of people are developing cancer and other life-threatening diseases from red meat and the cooking of red meat.

Usually I would say "good try" on a poster that tries to shoot me down, but your attempt wasn't even "good".