You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #172: Armitage wasn't indicted, nor was Novak. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
172. Armitage wasn't indicted, nor was Novak.
Lesson #1: tell the Grand Jury and the FBI the truth.

Libby was indicted for failing to do that. However, I suspect that lesson #1 wouldn't have saved Scooter, because he had a reason to lie and obstruct justice. It was because he had committed a crime. A crime that his boss, the VP, was directing.

Lesson #2: it ain't over until it's over. Unless you know, you don't know. And as long as there is information to which only the prosecutor is privy, you don't know, and it ain't over.

So I don't know. But it ain't over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC