|
Edited on Mon Aug-21-06 01:23 AM by Superman Returns
Im only twenty, so sorry if I don't know what was happening among liberals in 1992. What I do know is that Bush Senior was not a neocon, had luke-warm relations with Israel, had moderate social views, didn't go into Baghdad, and lost to Bill Clinton. If this guy was behind taking over the U.S. and putting his son into power, I don't get why these events transpired under his Presidency. Importantly, why would he let himself lose to Bill Clinton and not swiftboat the guy into oblivion? If he was some grand master, he wouldn't have ran a terrible campaign.
|