You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #84: Taking threats Seriously
[View All]
dollydew
(127 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-10-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message |
84. Taking threats Seriously |
|
Well, I might be less dubious if :
1. The POTUS hadn't said he didn't worry much about Bin Laden anymore.
2. The U.S. hadn't shut down the CIA unit responsible for finding him.
3. The U.S. swore getting Al Zawari (sp?) was the death knell of any serious terrorist threats.
Remember, Al Z. was the the latest uber-terror bogey man. The terrorists had lost their leader. They were now in disarray (for the 20th time).
If the story is true, I'm glad the plotters were caught and no one died.
Remember the Downing Street Minutes. Blair is perfectly capable of lying for/covering-up for the POTUS. Even if it damages his own political career.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.