You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #61: heard that according to TX law Lay is now considered 'never to have been
[View All]
bobbieinok
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-07-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
61. heard that according to TX law Lay is now considered 'never to have been |
|
found guilty'.
So his death before sentencing and appeals means that in the history books he is listed as NOT GUILTY.
This whole thing is so suspicious. I wondered when I heard of his death but now learning in this thread that he was cremated and the question of the autopsy.
And yet a question regarding the quickness of the autopsy mentioned above:--if a person dies in a hospital under a doctor's care is an autopsy normally done?? I thought only if there's some reason to think that the cause of the hospital stay did NOT cause the death, which apparently was not the case here.
Also, was he in Aspen? Why--a vacation there or a meeting?? Remember Libby's note to Judith Miller about 'the Aspens'.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.