You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: Easy enough. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Easy enough.
A) What claims? The seth ones.

B) "I've been waiting around to see if there was some justification for that nickname. " waiting is probably not the best idea. In the back and forth of ideas, we find the truth. Moreover, when I'm not responding, you've nothing to see and thus no way to learn.

C) You know, we actually kind of knew that people with prosthetic limbs could go well, and that large, sudden changes on the scale of losing an arm change people a lot. In fact, that's a fairly well-known response.

"So, which illnesses do you think are caused by suggestion, and why?"

The question is: What was the illness? Was it cured? (In your story about the amputee) 'cos I'm not seeing anything that could be sensibly classified as an illness that was caused by suggestion. Becoming depressed when losing something to vital is normal, not an illness. Some people learn to cope, and some don't. This is also normal.

D) Your father had polio at an opportune time, and this is evidence illness is caused by suggestion?

Now, it is very interesting that you consider this evidence. Because a lot of things happened before your father became ill, but you've chosen a particular one. This is known as confirmation bias.

Actually, it might not be. Do you have any reason to suspect one particular cause over any other? If so, what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC