Reply #5: On second reading

[NJCher]

I thought this article so intriguing that I came back to read it again.

On second reading, I find these passages most interesting:

1) bush has already destroyed entire civilizations (possibly planets!) before:

Destructive forces are so strong around him that he may actually destroy more than you can believe: he has already been participant of the destruction of a civilization – or a planet – in one of his previous incarnations.

In addition, recall what environmentalists said at the end of the 90s? They said we don't have much time to turn things around. Now I think we can pretty much say we've gone over the edge. "Environmental disaster" is on the march!

2) Wonder if the following means we blue-staters get to dump Jesusland?

Indeed, it is possible that the whole country will break up under or soon after his second term (see later), which he is probably not going to complete in office.

I will be so happy to see it if he cannot complete his term. The very idea that he thinks he's finally one-upped his father because he stole a second term in office galls me.

Also, I would love it if I had to apply for a passport to go to Jesusland.

3) We at DU have long observed that he's hit the sauce over the years. His pictures and the behavior show it plain as day:

He is an alcoholic – it is next to impossible to remain sober for a long time with this constellation. (Mercury with Pluto and Saturn, with Moon as dispositor means a destructive mind)

And recall all those glazed-eye pics of Laura? Look at this:

... his wife uses pills.

We pegged her as a Stepford Wife a long time ago.

4) This is both good and bad for us:

He does not know why, but the more he fights any party, the stronger his enemies become.

Good in the sense that as a party we've become stronger. Bad in the sense that bush has made Al Quaeda stronger.

5) Looks like his failures will be taken up by aspiring candidates in the '06 elections:

When Jupiter enters Scorpio in sidereal counting (late October, 2006), his enemies will have a field day...

And I hope it wins us better representation in the House and Senate.

6. Recall his Freudian slip about the "crusade" early in his term? It caused such controversy?

The wars he will bring about can cause the very dissolution of the country: the issue fought for is an old one, probably a war on religion, the Crusades etc.

Maybe that was one of his former selves creeping through. Muslims were rightfully outraged by that remark and looking at the slaughter that's going on over there, is there any doubt at all that this is a way of eliminating them?

7. Finally, this:

As far as his opponent, Kerry is concerned: we are surprised to learn – looking at his chart – that he is moved by the same Plutonian forces, which means he would have been the executor of the same will as Bush.

Does anyone recall that astrologers said something similar about bush and Gore in 2000? I recall them saying one was Tweedledee and the other was Tweedledum. While not for a minute do I think we would be in Iraq with Gore, it makes one wonder if it's not the ruthless foreign policy this country has pursued over the years that is coming to light and for which retribution will be exacted. In that sense, I think the issue is larger than any president as it is the accumulation of decades.

Thoughts, anyone?


Cher