You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #4: I think it is the early exposure to polyacrylamide dust
[View All]
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I think it is the early exposure to polyacrylamide dust |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 06:46 PM by HereSince1628
Many of the DNA jockeys like this idea.
Considering the age of the universe, the precollision time needed to evolve life on some lonely planet somewhere, the need for multiple appropriate collisions needed to overcome the unlikelihood of an individual circumstance of undoubtedly low probability to eject the undoubtedly rare bio-bearing ejected boloid onto a trajectory escaping its own planetary system while bringing it into an extremely fortuitous intersection with a life sustaining planet rather than missing entirely or being drawn into collisions with life unfriendly objects... I wonder... is there sufficient time to consider this really probable. Any DU'er know if the calculations have been done?
With all the improbability of the intervening events it just seems less improbable that chemical evolution would lead to life on little old Terra.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.