You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #197: Lets cut to the chase, shall we? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Strong Atheist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #194
197. Lets cut to the chase, shall we?
I do not understand why you believe what you believe

Here is the way I see matters of "morality".


The universe can be broken up into "things" (matter and energy) and their relations to each other in time and space (which may also be "things", or A thing, but I am not going to worry about the physics here). Thing #1 is separated from thing #2 by a certain amount of space at time #1. It is separated by less space at time #2, etc.

These all fall into the category that I call "facts". They ARE relations, regardless of what anyone thinks of them.

Then there are thoughts/concepts/ideas. These can either be true, in that they accurately reflect reality (to some degree, I mean we are told that "solid" objects are mostly empty space, but for my purposes our senses on the macro level reflect A macro truth), or false because they do not reflect reality. "The Earth is more or less spherical" is a true concept, because it reflects reality. "The Earth is flat" is a false concept, because it does not even come close to accurately reflecting reality.

Finally, there are emotions/opinions. These are ideas about reality that are neither true nor false; they are SUBJECTIVE impressions of reality. They are "true" only to the individual. "I like ice cream" and "Murder is wrong" are both emoting statements that are neither true nor false IN REALITY; they express my opinions on facts.

Example: A finger squeezes a trigger. A bullet moves through space and time, and strikes a person in the chest, killing that person.

These are all facts. Any MORAL statements about them are opinions, and as such are subjective.

THAT is how I view things, to answer your question. WHY[/b} I believe it is because, after thought, it is what seems to be the case to me. That is, I think all of these views accurately reflect how things are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC