Reply #87: I don't know of any evidence of the things you mention.

[immoderate]

Concsiousness is not local? There is evidence of that? Let's claim the Randi prize.

Flying is a poor example because there are intermediate steps. Consider "flying" squirrels or "flying" fish which kind of glide.

Gradual is subjective. Mutations are not gradual. Adaptations are the result of changes over a whole species, not a sudden change. It's as easy to say there are missing steps in natural history than to assert that something sprang into existence because there are gaps in the fossil record.

This sound like the ID point of view. Have you read Dawkins' "The Blind Watchmaker"? It more than amply refutes this stuff.

--IMM