You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #28: I'm not sure [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology

muriel_volestrangler

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Oct-14-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #26

28. I'm not sure

I did think that Buddhism might have problems under that legal definition, because they don't have a supreme being (but they do revere things); I see there is a new Charities Bill currently going through the British parliament, which says religion includes religions with more than one god, and those with no gods, so perhaps they also thought Buddhism might have problems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.