You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: It's just standard, "common or garden" logic [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Stunster Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. It's just standard, "common or garden" logic
The non-existence of God is not logically entailed by either of those two propositions.

The following three propositions form a consistent set, i.e., it's logically possible that they could all be true simultaneously:

"The universe shows no evidence for God"

"The universe looks exactly as it would be expected to look if there is no God"

"God exists"


There's nothing Catholic or fundamentalist about it. The first two propositions do not entail the falsity of the third.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC