You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #19: Well, thanks for chiming in despite the tight schedule. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well, thanks for chiming in despite the tight schedule.
Sounds like the judge was pretty unimpressed with the case. So am I. Comparing it to the Nassau case points up why. Perhaps Yellowhorse hadn't time to get familiarized with that before posting this.

Nevertheless, the only ruling I see made was a refusal to provide injunctive relief. The case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. So that case, or better, a better one is not ruled out.

Perhaps the DREs could be replaced with scanners. And *cough* audits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC