Reply #215: Here's the proof:

[tommcintyre]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=203&topic_id=371175#371807
Post by you:
"I have explained in emails to you, that I did not "attempt to cover up" after I was "outed" as you call it."

You were responding to the paragraph in the post immediately above by me:
"We now know Febble's since she has admitted (after being "outed" by Kathy, and subsequently trying to cover it up) that she works for Mitofsky. And, we also know (again, by her own admission, only after being "called" on it), that she feigned no foreknowledge of information to be presented at a conference, in an attempt to advance her position, and discredit USCVs'."

Also, due to the "discrepancies" in our two stories, I offered to re-post the deleted thread (#66 - same thread) that would clarify all of this. (Plus, as I have pointed out here, there is a post that identifies what you wrote in that deleted post.)
"As far as your first six paragraphs, we have quite different interpretations of what happened. I stand by my "raw data" thread, and, with your repeated permission, would be glad to re-post it."

I this clear now?