Reply #109: "weak because it is weak"--powerful argument there

[mgr]

Who can disprove a tautology like that. 100 pages of statistical drivel? 20 pages of fluff? From your past posting patterns, I doubt that you have means to address what the statistical analysis implies, or what it weaknesses are, but take your cues from others. But your ad hominen arguments are right up there with everyone elses'.

The DNC report is about Ohio, not Florida, however it reverberates with what was wrong in Florida in 2000, and 2004. And we were not beaten in the op scan counties in Florida, but by the long lines in the DRE counties turning people away--Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade. Get the story right. The optiscan issue died long ago due to lack of historical precedence, and BBV's inability to show that the central tabulators could be hacked outside the BOE's network.

Now I am not a naysayer, but a member of the DNC, I'm going up in your opprobrium. I guess I will have to discuss that with Mehlman's drone, OTOH.

I may suggest that if the party leadership offends you, may be it is you that does not belong.

Mike