You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: You can only believe there is no 'proof' [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. You can only believe there is no 'proof'
...if you choose to willfully ignore the reams and reams of hard evidence and testimony collected by Conyers, and the brave lawyers in Ohio. Not to mention TruthIsAll's piles and piles of damning numbers. And yes, there is specific testimony that machines were tampered with. The only reason there is no 'proof' (i.e. opening the machines and looking inside) is that Blackwell has kept them locked up (which under Ohio law is presumptive evidence of election fraud).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC