Reply #119: What loot, Stephanie?

[bailey77]

specifically, what loot?

Is hearing another side of the story so painful that it can't be tolerated?

There is no loot, and Harris certainly has no retirement account. In fact, that's what makes it so ironic that the very thing David Allen keeps harping on -- "cashing in" -- is opposite of the truth.

Now, suppose on March 11, the judge does award Harris the $76,000. If you had no retirement, had used up your savings in this effort, had written a book but the publisher failed to pay royalties or even send sales statements, and the ONLY compensation you could receive for a year and a half's work would be $76,000, would you then turn around and give it away?

Nope, didn't think so.

Is that what infuriates you so about Harris? That she didn't cash in, and is showing herself to be more pure than most of you?

Stephanie, you don't speak for "everyone." "No one believes you" is not yours to say. DU may not. But there are witnesses to exactly what's been going on, and I notice no one is asking anyone at Black Box Voting -- not one of the 10 people -- for their side of the story.

Doesn't anyone find that odd?

Not a single one of those ten people could possibly have anything of interest to say. Hmm. Strange. The only one who can be believed is the guy who was fired by unanimous decision for -- among other things -- lying to the board of directors.

Strange. They must all be pod people.