Reply #54: Yes.

[Peace Patriot]

See my reply to #2 above. Arnebeck filed against both the Prez and state Supreme Court Chief Justice (Moyers) elections. (Both elections are tainted with election fraud, and the Prez case is affected by the Moyers case, not only by the evidence, but also because Moyers, newly elected in this election, presided over the Bush Ohio Electors casting their ballots this Monday, Dec. 13--an action that Arnebeck had filed a motion to stop them from doing, either now or on Jan.6. Moyers shouldn't be ruling on either of these cases!)

I just re-read the ruling, and here is something more:

In the dismissal "without prejudice" today, Moyers was careful to say that he was ruling only on the Prez election part of the complaint. But, you see, this, too, is a "technicality." He uses a questionable technicality to sever the two cases (the Prez election case, and his own election case), and then says that he is only acting on the Prez case. That's really splitting hairs! He's trying to say that he has no conflict of interest in doing this--but he clearly does!