Reply #78: Right

[wiggs]

This affidavit, if not discredited, moves the discussion from the completely "hypothetical" category to the "likely" category, IMO.

And you are also right...if it can be shown definitively that republicans in power have conducted themselves dishonestly with this, then the snowball will gather momentum downhill and you'll see more whistleblowers, more skepticism of past events, more scrutiny, etc.

I can't wait to see who in the media reports this and how. This may be a tipping point. The SBVT garbage was a litmus test for media and we all know who passed and who failed. This will be a similar, telling issue. Buried on page 26 or front page?

I bet there is A LOT of checking going on right now regarding Curtis. Is he associated with Rove? Is he a disgruntled employee of Yang? Who is Brad? Who is Madsen?

How sweet would it be for Rather to get all this verified first and break it open on MSM?