Reply #51: can't ignore either...

[geo]

Hi intelle,

I've been wrestling with a balance on both as well. The one good thing about California is that if fraud happened here, we will find it or it'll be obvious who is hiding it. We have excellent sunshine laws here. If we find fraud here, we can break through the media gridlock like a hot knife through warm margarine. Keep in mind I AM former media here in L.A. (wrote and edited for a couple years, anyway; fed to CNN radio & AP on occasion) and have an idea how things work down here. ;) We'll get covered if we find something hard and credible to report. Beyond that, if the data is telling enough, we may narrow it down to the perp. I would love nothing more than to get California's AG looking at this mess.

Just know that I started this effort after I gave the numbers a hard look myself, and saw some patterns that were of concern. I'm also focused on keeping our collective time investment low unless something breaks. :) I agree that our collective person-power should not be spent frivolously. :) :)

I think we have made some excellent progress in the battleground states, but I do feel Iowa is being a little too ignored. Anyone reading this post that is NOT from California should try to support the swing state efforts. :) :) :)

Warmly,

George