You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #9: Point blank: McP conditionally certified Diebold and it makes no sense
[View All]
GuvWurld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-06-06 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Point blank: McP conditionally certified Diebold and it makes no sense |
|
The Berkeley report was totally damning and did indeed confirm the Hursti hack. McPherson responded by conditionally certifying Diebold. It is mystifying and dumbfounding. The report was the perfect justification for rejecting the certification but instead it was used to grant conditional certification. It is flagrantly lawless, not because of Hursti but because of the confirmed presence of the interpreter code in conflict with the fed guidelines.
That's just a simple re-cap of current events. There was a time when CA de-certified Diebold but that was back in 2004. This led to Kevin Shelley's ouster from the SoS office and in turn the appointment of McPherson.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.