Reply #12: Well, to the extent that money could help solve the problem, she has it!

[Bill Bored]

But then why isn't there more of a privately funded investigation going on by someone like her or Soros? Or is there? (No reason to tell us about that yet. You'd first want to find the smoking gun. Perhaps they are close to finding one?)

THK made reference to fascism in her speech at the DNC. It wasn't American fascism, but her point was that she knows it when she sees it. That's one advantage of not being born here; to most of us, this is unthinkable!

If she can dig up some Republican friends of her late husband (hopefully, she won't have to do this literally) and enlist their support, we may get somewhere with all this. If the smoking gun is not brought to the public's attention in a bi-partisan manner, half the people will simply not believe it!

Speaking of money, I've become somewhat pessimistic about the weakness of some of the verified voting legislation in Congress and elsewhere. But if we do have voter-verified paper "records", I would hope that all it would take would be MONEY to audit them and find the truth! One of the biggest objections to these bills is that the candidates would have to PAY for much of the hand counting. But cash is something the Dems had in abundance in 2004, and what better way is there to spend it? So why didn't they use some to get a fair recount in Ohio or some other key races besides the WA Gov's?

What's the latest on your suit, Land Shark?