You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #75: No he wouldn't face any "wrath" -
[View All]
qwghlmian
(768 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-30-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #74 |
| 75. No he wouldn't face any "wrath" - |
|
because the AG decision clearly says that absent a court order (and there is no such order) public access is mandated. You cannot "face the wrath of the federal court judge" if you follow the law, if the judge didn't want public access, he would issue an order. You're just plainly making it up. The question is why you're making it up.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread