You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ten Things anti-BBV forces have done without help from the MSM [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 02:25 PM
Original message
Ten Things anti-BBV forces have done without help from the MSM
Advertisements [?]
I was responding to a story by a reporter:

http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/news/10726274.htm

and expressing my continued frustration about the portrayal of the anti-BBV crowd as "cranks". I then jotted down ten things that we had dug up by ourself and how if a single reporter had done this he would be dancing on Pulitizers. (which sounds like a Kevin Costner movie, "Dances on Pulitzers").

Here's my list, which I will post on blackboxvoting.com. Please feel free to suggest stuff I may have missed. I prefer hard fact to conjecture.

As much as everyone wants to dismiss anti-BBV activists as "cranks", the movement has a pretty impressive track record for digging up the truth. Activists, not the media and not government bodies responsible for the agencies in question have:

1) Exposed Diebold's voting machine software as poorly written and
highly vulnerable to tampering.

2) Exposed Diebold's internal email proving they knew how poor their
software was and that they conspired to lie to the public and election
officials about the problems. We also pointed to sections in the email
where Diebold conspires to conceal problems from the "Independent"
Testings Authority.

3) Exposed vulnerabilities in Sequoia's software.

4) Exposed the use of uncertified equipment in California and Georgia.

5) Exposed a secret phone conference where the voting machine companies hired a lobbyist to try and gloss over the problems.

6) Exposed the fact that money to lobby the government to pass HAVA
came from the companies such as Lockheed-Martin, General Dynamics and
Grumman, which begs the question, "Why are defense contractors pushing
for electronic voting?"

7) Pointed out that machines which were shown to have almost ZERO
security and high failure rates PASSED the ITA's certifcation program.

8) Exposed the fact that the ITAs will not discuss how they certify
votings machines and refer all questions to The Election Center. The
Election Center (not a government agency) is responsible for certifying who certifies voting machines and is secretly takes money from the voting machine companies.

9) Cultivated insiders who provided valuable information about how
security and reliability concerns are routinely dismissed by management in voting machine companies.

10) Warned Sandra Page in Gaston county that trusting Diebold could cost her job and warned Gary Bartlett that DREs could compromise the integrity of elections in NC and law suits over who actually won a race.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC