Reply #64: People just can't accept the loss?

[Laurab]

Philly Buster :"The election results are hard to accept, a big disappointment. But that does not mean there was enough fraud to throw the election to Bush. I think most of the theories expounded here (especially exit polls) are just a way of coping with the election results. People just can't accept the loss so they make their minds believe it had to be fraud."

Sorry, but it does not mean there was NOT enough fraud to throw the election to *, either. I could easily cope with election results that I could trust. From what I've seen, and from what I know of the way this administration operates, I do NOT trust these election results. If it was an honest election, why is there absolutely no cooperation on the part of people like Kenny B to open up and SHOW us how fair the election was? It's the least they could do in a democracy. What we've seen instead, is anyone who questions being thwarted at every turn. Lack of response, trying to get out of being subpoenaed. Why act guilty is there is nothing to be guilty of? The last I knew, this was SUPPOSED to be a democracy. The great thing about democracies is that elections are open, honest and fair. So, why the stonewalling?

Sorry, Philly but I take offense to your statement - it basically calls me, and anyone else who feels election fraud likely happened a "sore loser". That, I am not. What I am is a great believer in democracy, who doesn't understand why they just don't ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTIONS? It's THAT simple. Had they done that, and had diebold assisted with their "secret codes", there would be no issue here at all.

I ask again - why act guilty if you're not?