Reply #32: Haven't heard a single fact AGAINST election fraud

[Land Shark]

At the "risk" of self-promotion, I co-wrote a 29 page evidentiary report called ELection Irregularities in Snohomish County, Washington, General Election 2004 in which I examined the evidence for DREs voting Republican. Among other things, I found that machines that were shut down early because of malfunctions had 50% more votes on them for Republican Rossi than for Democrat Gregoire, even though the election was close statewide and within 5 points in Snohomish County.

THis report has been available for download at www.votersunite.org/info/SnohomishElectionFraudInvestigation.pdf for a couple weeks now.

Although I've received over a hundred emails on it, no person has written with a SINGLE FACT or even a lame ARGUMENT against it.

Imagine then this thread from my point of view. I didn't shut up, I PUT UP some evidence, and there's been no facts or argument against it.

Because it is always the TOTALITY of the facts that proves fraud (and there's always counterarguments against individual facts) the only people that made CREDIBLE arguments that there's little or no evidence are those who have the MOTIVATION, the RESOURCES, and the TIME to SCOUR all the evidence.

In other words, I find the Bush administration's admission that there are no WMD in Iraq HIGHLY CREDIBLE, since I would trust them to find it if it existed.

THose who don't think there's evidence think of themselves as being responsible and objective, but in fact they need to educate themselves a bit more before they can actually enter the arena of debate (and I am not assuming that fraud is proved per se, I am simply saying that extremely few or none of the persons dismissing fraud have reviewed much evidence).