Reply #75: the only thing you showed was the ability to Google

[foo_bar]

as you neglected to mention where or when these hypothetical degrees were attained, as originally asked. That it took an hour and a dozen posts to even get names of (someone's) degrees indicates something less than forthright honesty.

Ok, I showed you mine. Now show us yours.

The logical difference is, I never invoked my education as evidence for competence. In the interest of disclosure, B.A. Psychology, Brandeis University 1994.

is it not logical for us to assume that since you have never presented analysis to dispute mine, only nasty one-liners, that you are mathematically challenged?

Garbage in, garbage out. Your use of MS Excel is sound, but your premises are unscientific and illogical, such as placing the burden of proof on the accused. Or confusing inferential statistics with "proof". Or the idea of a conclusion preceding a hypothesis, or the notion of peer review as a conspiratorial attack on your person.