You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #47: You are arguing why there is no hard evidence
[View All]
madbelgiancow
(130 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-03-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 47. You are arguing why there is no hard evidence |
|
to base a negligence lawsuit on.
I was arguing why now is the time to stand up and be counted and not be concerned about the legal case, but the case of the people.
And by the way, I would imagine a BOE to have a pretty good estimate of the expected turnout through the monitoring of registrations.
If then the number of machines foreseen is inadequate in heavily democratic areas and not in republican areas which also had high registration rates, you may even have a negligence case against them.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread