You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: I thought this passage in another DUer's letter was spot on... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought this passage in another DUer's letter was spot on...
“You do not need clear evidence of ‘fraud,’ however you might define it, in order to contest the election. If a person disappears over a cliff, do you turn your back and go about your business because you have no evidence of injury or death? If your house is on fire do you walk away just because you don't know how it started? The MASSIVE list of disturbing unanswered questions is more than enough to justify standing up and demanding answers before accepting the electors' votes.”

Wish I remembered the name of the poster.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC